🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.